RE: Suggestion for 2.4 -- it's not too late!

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

> 
> But I believe the point here should be:
> If Euphoria is not intended to be run on Windows 3.1 (presumably with 
> the 32-bit extension package Win32s), then it shouldn't have a subsystem 
> 
> version number of 3.1.  We already know that changing it only gets rid 
> of the aforementioned quirks and doesn't break anything, so why not just 
> 
> distribute it as a 4.0 app?
> 

I agree -- what is the point exactly of having it have a 3.1 version 
number?  I have noticed my Windows programs are also "better behaved" 
once they have been converted.  It seems confusing and unnecessary to 
have the 3.1 at all.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu