lcc-win32
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01C2BC21.5F8353A0
charset="iso-8859-1"
Dear friends:
You write about my system (in your web pages):
>>
Translator and run-time library for Windows using LccWin C
LccWin is a free C compiler for 32-bit Windows. (5 Mb). Severe bugs have
been introduced in Lcc recently that render it almost useless for our
purposes. Until these bugs are fixed, we strongly recommend that you=20
download Borland instead. Lcc's -O optimization option is particularly
buggy. If you have any problems with Lcc, you should run emake.bat=20
again, but without the -O options. (But you really should consider using =
Borland or Watcom instead!).
<<
I would like to point out that:
1) I have never received a bug report from your part. At least I do not=20
remember.
2) If you do not like my system, I would recommend you to avoid using=20
it. Borland compilers, as you say in your web site, are much better.
3) I provide my system for free, at no obligation from my part. I try to =
improve my system as much as I can without writing any bugs, but as you=20
can see, I fail in this task, and I do make mistakes. The best thing is=20
to use tools that are not in this stage of development like Borland=20
tools, or that have a bigger budget and commercial surface than an=20
individual programmer will ever be able to achieve.
For all this reasons then, I propose that you take out lcc-win32 from=20
the list of supported C compilers. Why make me negative publicity? I do=20
what I can guys, probably as hard as you do.
jacob
------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01C2BC21.5F8353A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Courier New"><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">Dear=20
friends:<BR><BR>You write about my system (in your web pages):<BR><FONT=20
face=3D"Courier New">>></FONT><BR>Translator and run-time library =
for=20
Windows using LccWin C<BR>LccWin is a free C compiler for 32-bit =
Windows. (5=20
Mb). Severe bugs have<BR>been introduced in Lcc recently that render it =
almost=20
useless for our<BR>purposes. Until these bugs are fixed, we strongly =
recommend=20
that you <BR>download Borland instead. Lcc's -O optimization option is=20
particularly<BR>buggy. If you have any problems with Lcc, you should run =
emake.bat <BR>again, but without the -O options. (But you really should =
consider=20
using <BR>Borland or Watcom instead!).<BR><FONT=20
face=3D"Courier New"><<</FONT><BR></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Courier New"><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">I would =
like to point=20
out that:<BR>1) I have never received a bug report from your part. At =
least I do=20
not <BR>remember.<BR><BR>2) If you do not like my system, I would =
recommend you=20
to avoid using <BR>it. Borland compilers, as you say in your web =
site, are=20
much better.<BR><BR>3) I provide my system for free, at no obligation =
from my=20
part. I try to <BR>improve my system as much as I can without writing =
any bugs,=20
but as you <BR>can see, I fail in this task, and I do make mistakes. The =
best=20
thing is <BR>to use tools that are not in this stage of development like =
Borland=20
<BR>tools, or that have a bigger budget and commercial surface than an=20
<BR>individual programmer will ever be able to achieve.<BR><BR>For all =
this=20
reasons then, I propose that you take out lcc-win32 from <BR>the list of =
supported C compilers. Why make me negative publicity? I do <BR>what I =
can guys,=20
probably as hard as you do.</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Courier New"><FONT=20
face=3D"Courier New"></FONT></FONT> </DIV><FONT face=3D"Courier =
New"><FONT=20
face=3D"Times New Roman">
------=_NextPart_000_00A9_01C2BC21.5F8353A0--
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
