RE: asearch

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Robert Craig wrote:
> Robert Szalay writes:
> > Maybe RDS will use it as the official Archive search engine ??
> 
> I'd like to see it.
> 
> If it's significantly better, we'll use it.
> 
> If it's marginally better, probably not,
> since it will cost me extra time in future 
> maintenance efforts.
> 
> By the way, speed is not an issue for the file archive search.
> It currently uses about 0.1 seconds to search the EDS database.
> Any other delay you see is network delay.

Is that so.
Well.  That makes sense.  I'm sure the server is a lot faster than my 
computer.  On my computer, it takes about 2.5 - 3 seconds for it to do 
the search. (120mhz, 96mb ram, Win98SE)
I borrowed the lower() that you used in asearch after i tested and found 
it was faster. (on my computer, beat wildcard.e's lower by about 12 
seconds over 100,000 passes)
Maybe it should become the official lower() ?


Q:  Are you going to get rid of some of the include files ?
    Some of the stuff seems to me that it should be built-in.


Thanks, 
   Robert Szalay

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu