RE: asearch
- Posted by Robert Szalay <robsz1 at hotpop.com> Jan 12, 2003
- 544 views
Robert Craig wrote: > Robert Szalay writes: > > Maybe RDS will use it as the official Archive search engine ?? > > I'd like to see it. > > If it's significantly better, we'll use it. > > If it's marginally better, probably not, > since it will cost me extra time in future > maintenance efforts. > > By the way, speed is not an issue for the file archive search. > It currently uses about 0.1 seconds to search the EDS database. > Any other delay you see is network delay. Is that so. Well. That makes sense. I'm sure the server is a lot faster than my computer. On my computer, it takes about 2.5 - 3 seconds for it to do the search. (120mhz, 96mb ram, Win98SE) I borrowed the lower() that you used in asearch after i tested and found it was faster. (on my computer, beat wildcard.e's lower by about 12 seconds over 100,000 passes) Maybe it should become the official lower() ? Q: Are you going to get rid of some of the include files ? Some of the stuff seems to me that it should be built-in. Thanks, Robert Szalay