OpenEuphoria

RE: v2.5 Opens exw files wayyyy too slow

• Posted by "Kat" <gertie at visionsix.com> Dec 24, 2004
• 572 views

On 23 Dec 2004, at 3:55, Matt Lewis wrote:

> 
> 
> posted by: Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at yahoo.com>
> 
> Vincent wrote:
> > 
> > Chris Bensler wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The biggest Euphoria program in the world takes you an extra
> > > > 2 seconds to load. Pity.
> > > 
> > > 2 seconds is not even acceptible for a compiler anymore. How should it
> > > be any more acceptible for an interpeter, which is supposed to excecute my
> > > code immediately. That IS the main purpose of an interpeter isn't it?
> > > 
> > I was able to get my 105 MB Windows EU program to translate
> > and complie perfectly, to a 70 MB EXE (uncompressed) 71 KB(kilo-bytes) EXE
> > file (ultra-compressed) But took 3.5 hours to translate and "45 minutes" to
> > do
> > the compiling with Open Watcom 1.3 It could be alot worse if it was 105 MB
> > of
> > user defined ruitines. Yes, Watcom is the slowest but its the best for the
> > translator. It takes about 20 minutes to translate and compile Enhanced IDE.
> > Eu2C is my favorate product, even more than Euphoria it self :P LOL
> 
> This is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard on this list.

<!!WHEW!!>

I agree. How long did it take to debug 105 megabytes of source code?

Kat