RE: v2.5 Opens exw files wayyyy too slow
Vincent wrote:
>
> Chris Bensler wrote:
> >
> > > The biggest Euphoria program in the world takes you an extra
> > > 2 seconds to load. Pity.
> >
> > 2 seconds is not even acceptible for a compiler anymore. How should it
> > be any more acceptible for an interpeter, which is supposed to excecute
> > my code immediately. That IS the main purpose of an interpeter isn't it?
> >
> I was able to get my 105 MB Windows EU program to translate
> and complie perfectly, to a 70 MB EXE (uncompressed) 71 KB(kilo-bytes) EXE
> file (ultra-compressed) But took 3.5 hours to translate and "45 minutes"
> to do the compiling with Open Watcom 1.3 It could be alot worse if
> it was 105 MB of user defined ruitines. Yes, Watcom is the slowest
> but its the best for the translator. It takes about 20 minutes to
> translate and compile Enhanced IDE. Eu2C is my favorate product, even
> more than Euphoria it self :P LOL
This is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard on this list.
(Both the 2sec compiler, and the 105MB program). That aside, I mostly
use Borland, because it builds *so* much faster (although looking now,
I see I've still got OW 1.2).
Can you please tell me what you envision doing that would legitimately
have 105MB of source code? That all *needs* to be loaded at once?
Matt Lewis
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
