OpenEuphoria

RE: Why do people still insist on including uneccessary files

• Posted by Vincent <darkvincentdude at yahoo.com> Dec 23, 2004
• 662 views

Ferlin Scarborough wrote:
> 
> Dave Probert wrote:
> > 
> But, someone new to Euphoria is not going to have all these libraries, and
> then when they try to find say 0.52 of Win32Lib and discover there is no
> link to it any more, well, that would be VERY DISCOURAGING don't you think?
> 
> > PS.  My next upload will include the whole of the Windows OS just so you
> > might have
> > it for a single line of code I wrote!!! (Sarcasm)
> > 
> 
> Now that is funny roflmao.  While your at it, make sure the OS is a more
> stable
> version than I have. 
> 
> Longhorn anyone? LOL!
> 
> 
> Later.
> 
> Ferlin Scarborough
> 
Speaking of OS, the next version of Windows..
Windows Longhorn is supposibly designed to run on no less than a entry-level
computer in 2006. Just a 4-6 GHz Processor, 1 GB Ram, 64 MB 3D graphics card
for avalon subsystem, nice sound card, 500 GB to 1 TB Hard drive.
Imagine trying to play Doom 3 on top of such a CPU and graphic card
intensive OS. Its insane even for 2006. Look at XP.. it runs
satisfactory on a Pentium 2, 233 MHz, 128 MB ram, 8 MB graphics card, 8 GB
Hard drive.

And some of you people still use old Pentium 2s or worse?? LOL
Heres the solution...

Tell Microsoft that they can shove their "Longhorn up their !@#" 
And that .NET is fine on XP and below. Specially since it is now
multiplatform thanks to Mono.