OpenEuphoria

RE: v2.5 Opens exw files wayyyy too slow

• Posted by Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at yahoo.com> Dec 21, 2004
• 568 views

Chris Bensler wrote:
> 
> I also choose to use an intepreter because I take advantage of that 
> trait. I often use dynamic inclusion, and also make config files using 
> eu source. You can't compile either of those methods.
> 
> Installing euphoria on a clients machine is not a big deal either.
> They don't know any different whatsoever. That would be a different 
> story if I tried that with 2.5

Why is there any difference?  OK, I understand that you've been taking 
advantage of a feature that Rob has been warning might go away since it
was first brought up.  You can't do that any more, but it shouldn't be
a huge surprise.  Why are you installing alpha software on a client's
computer, anyway?

> What about CGI apps? We are supposed to bind them too?

How big are your CGI apps?  If you're really concerned about speed, you'd
have already translated them already anyway.  A CGI app in a 'production'
environment shouldn't be undergoing lots of editing anyway, so it shouldn't
really be a hardship to bind or translate once and leave running. 

Matt Lewis