RE: v2.5 Opens exw files wayyyy too slow
Bernie Ryan wrote:
> J:
>
> Does this mean that a NEW USER or BEGINNER that wants to use a
> large program or library has to buy the binder or translator
> to use it ??????????????
>
> The purpose of writing libraries is to help others to learn
> programming or make a user's job easier and faster not to
> create customers for RDS.
>
> The loading speed is going to turn new user's away from
> Euphoria.
Good point. How does Euphoria 2.5 stack up against other interpreted languages?
(I don't count Java or C# because they are technically compiled into bytecode.)
Is it still faster than most versions of BASIC, which is its true competitor?
How about Python?
>
> 2.5 loading speed is a disaster !
>
> 2.5 is not an improvement over the former way that Euphoria
> was previously distibuted. I bought the "C" source code and
> could modify if I wanted to. Nobody requested that the front
> end be written in euphoria. RDS decided to do that.
> The effort should of gone into creating a Compiler.
How *do* 2.4 and previous versions handle the problem? Do they execute a line
of code right after it has been parsed and then set a flag when all lines have
been parsed? How does it work in the older versions and why couldn't it be
implemented in the Euphoria front end?
>
> Bernie
>
> My files in archive:
> w32engin.ew mixedlib.e eu_engin.e win32eru.ew
>
> Can be downloaded here:
> <a
> href="http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan">http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan</a>
>
=====================================
Too many freaks, not enough circuses.
j.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
