RE: v2.5 Opens exw files wayyyy too slow
Chris Bensler wrote:
> You are a hack. The only excuse I can think of for such rediculous logic
> is laziness.
Heh! I put in a lot of hours making the front end slower!
That's not laziness. 
I did it after watching you fail miserably in your attempts
to make a Euphoria clone. By writing the front-end in Euphoria, I am
able to give you a complete 100% compatible Public Domain
Euphoria interpreter with full source, and no restrictions,
and you still aren't happy.
> BTW, I have a 2.5Ghz, and I won't use 2.5 because it takes too long to
> load.
The biggest Euphoria program in the world takes you an extra
2 seconds to load. Pity.
> now you are saying I need to have a 2Ghz machine?
I don't have a 2 GHz machine, and I'm happy.
> What about my software customers? I should expect that every one of them
> can afford a brand new computer every year because Euphoria is catering
> only to the now?
You have customers?
Parse time is extremely important to you?
Why not get the binder for $39, or in your case, upgrade for $24?
Then your app will start up even *faster* than with 2.4.
> Most people don't have the slightest clue how to operate a computer,
But you want them to run your app as a bunch of separate files?
Why not bind into one .exe?
> The office I work at still has a 300mhz at it's front desk. And it's
> more than sufficient.
> Until last year, the office was serving 10 machines with a 400Mhz
> gateway.
> ...
> You think we're all rich or something?
You work in an office that has 10 machines, but you can't
afford $24 for the Binder?
> It's fortunate for you that eu targets newbie and hobbiest programmers,
> because realistic programers will laugh in your face!
You are constantly putting down Euphoria, myself, and Euphoria users,
yet you have been hanging around the Euphoria community for many
years. Obviously you have not found a better alternative in all that
time.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
