RE: Confidence

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hey Euman,

If you've got the courage to write a win32 prog without the aid of 
win32lib then you are just the type of person that should be helping the 
win32lib team.  I'm not an official member but I've sent plenty of 
emails to David Cuny (way back whan) and Derek Parnell when I've found 
issues.  You don't need to know how to fix it, you just need to expose 
the problems.

In the past, some of my inquiries and/or requests have gone unanswered 
but I would imagine that these guys get tons of stuff in their boxes and 
even less time to respond to them all (or remember to do so).  But it's 
difficult to know if your input is being heard when there are no new 
releases.  So Derek... what the heck is holding version 0.56?

The only way you can get feedback and bug reports is with frequent 
releases.  My feeling is that these should come out at least once a 
month, even if it only fixes a few bugs.  I know I've given you email 
that fixes at least one bug and/or have given you at least one possible 
addition to the lib.

Do I have to officially join the win32lib team to have my emails / bug 
reports / input considered?  If I join, do I get a copy of the 'bleeding 
edge' every few weeks?  Is the SourceForge site even being used anymore?

I could go on but I won't because I know what 'real life' is like.  I 
just wish we (users) could get some more betas.  Personally, I have no 
idea what might be fixed and what still needs fixing so I won't be 
giving you further feedback on 0.55.1.  I think there might be other 
users who feel the same way...

I hope you know that I'm not afraid to 'dig in' and submit fixes when I 
find the time but I don't want to waste my time with fixes that are 
already covered...

Hope I'm not being too harsh here...

-- Brian


Euman wrote:
> Now now, I should've worded that differently.
> 
> TRUTH:
> I kept running into bugs in *MY OWN CODE*
> simply because I dont have the understanding.
> 
> TRUTH:
> Win32lib would be much faster if it were streamlined but it's not to 
> retain
> that ease of use variable. .
> 
> TRUTH:
> Yes, there are bugs associated with Win32lib but they are being 
> addressed
> and eventually it will be a great library of very common and usefull 
> utilities.
> 
> TRUTH:
> When my abilities are at a level to contribute to the library I will but 
> at this
> time Im just a puppy when it comes to Windows programming.
> If I can learn the particulars of the WinAPI, I will be of much better 
> use
> with bug reports and with additions. Anyone can write a program in
> Win32lib but I dont want to be just anybody I want to know what my
> program is doing at all times.
> 
> Im sorry Derek if you think Im letting you all down
> 
> TRUTH:
> I have every belief in the Win32lib teams success.
> And Wish you every bit to boot.
> 
> 
> Euman
> 
> 
> 
> > Thanks for the vote of confidence!
> >
> > -----------
> > cheers,
> > Derek Parnell
> 
> 
>

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu