Re: planck
On 14 Apr 2002, at 22:35, a.tammer at hetnet.nl wrote:
>
> hi Karl, thanks for the new standard:
>
> But even calculated in planck the cubic size of the universe would only 2.56
> *
> 10 ^ 185 P
Ok, add in the same number of digits to express the inverse number, plus a
few for any overflow, and i'll agree that's a good limit. Is it do-able? How
about, to save processing time, the programmer can specify the significant
digits on each side of the decimal point, and the method of imposing the limit
(rounding up, rounding down, truncating, fuzzy(x))?
Kat
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
