Re: Threads [Was: Re: 64 bit euphoria]
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:30:47 -0700, Mario Steele
<guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:
>Pete Lomax wrote:
>> If you still have Edita installed, and have a spare moment, can you
>> post some figures for me, along with the name of the presumably Linux
>> editor you are comparing it against?
>
>Guess you kinda missed the whole "(Recently Free'ed Pinguin here)" part in the
I thought you might be running it on Wine, but I think that was Pete E
(and he did suggest a few bugfixes to make it run correctly which I
may not have uploaded yet)
>following paragraph. Unfortunatly, that means, I no longer have a Windows
>partion on the hard drive. But eh, it's okay. From what I can remember,
>the closest figures I can give you on loading Win32lib in Edita, was around
>3-4 seconds to fully parse it, and display the first "virtual" page of the
>Win32lib Source code. Agreed, not much of a delay, but Crimson Editor on
>Windows, can load up the entire Win32lib, and display, in less then, to about
>a second.
I trust you understand I feel obliged to correct you. You must have a
very slow box indeed if it takes 3-4 seconds. (You sure you meant
2.12GHz and not 2.12MHz?) I have just downloaded the latest version of
Crimson Editor, just to make sure it has not recently been drastically
improved, and it still takes at least six times longer than Edita to
load win32lib, and that is being generous (OTOH you must have a fairly
decent box if Crimson manages that in under a second). According to my
timings, CE is only a fraction faster than _MEditor_, which may be the
source of confusion here.
Regards,
Pete
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
