Re: 64 bit euphoria

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Jason Gade wrote:
> 
> Jason Gade wrote:
> > 
> > cklester wrote:
> > > 
> > > Jason Gade wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > One thing that I have noticed is that RDS is very careful with changes
> > > > made to the
> > > > language.  I know that it has frustrated many developers that it has not
> > > > moved beyond
> > > > a "beginner's" language.  Whether that is by design or not I don't know.
> > > 
> > > It's more than just a beginner's language. It's also a professional
> > > language.
> > > So, I guess it covers both points of that spectrum. ;)
> > 
> > I understand what you are saying, and I kind of agree, but I also kind of
> > disagree.
> > 
> > I know that professional apps have been written with Euphoria.  I also know
> > that a
> > lot of "professionals" (I'm actually only an amateur) take a look at it and
> > consider
> > it a toy.
> > 
> > Or like some people they use it for awhile and then move on when things
> > aren't changed
> > to their liking, right or wrong.
> > 
> > > 
> > > -=ck
> > > "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
> > > <a
> > > href="http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/">http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/</a>
> > > 
> 
> But my *real* point is that while threading and 64-bit are pretty cool there
> are other
> improvements that Euphoria could use.
> 
One improvement that would be great, and I think has been promised is
to add a suggested improvement section to the euphoria web site, so
we can all see the suggested improvements, why not to do some, and why to
do others, and status on them.
This is a MUST improvement.
Dan

> 
> > 
> > =====================================
> > Too many freaks, not enough circuses.
> > 
> > j.
> > 
> 
> =====================================
> Too many freaks, not enough circuses.
> 
> j.
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu