OpenEuphoria

Re: 64 bit euphoria

• Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com> Apr 22, 2005
• 473 views

Jason Gade wrote:
> 
> cklester wrote:
> > 
> > Jason Gade wrote:
> > > 
> > > One thing that I have noticed is that RDS is very careful with changes
> > > made to the
> > > language.  I know that it has frustrated many developers that it has not
> > > moved beyond
> > > a "beginner's" language.  Whether that is by design or not I don't know.
> > 
> > It's more than just a beginner's language. It's also a professional
> > language.
> > So, I guess it covers both points of that spectrum. ;)
> 
> I understand what you are saying, and I kind of agree, but I also kind of
> disagree.
> 
> I know that professional apps have been written with Euphoria.  I also know
> that a
> lot of "professionals" (I'm actually only an amateur) take a look at it and
> consider
> it a toy.
> 
> Or like some people they use it for awhile and then move on when things aren't
> changed
> to their liking, right or wrong.
> 
> > 
> > -=ck
> > "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
> > <a
> > href="http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/">http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/</a>
> > 

But my *real* point is that while threading and 64-bit are pretty cool there are
other improvements that Euphoria could use.


> 
> 
> =====================================
> Too many freaks, not enough circuses.
> 
> j.
> 


=====================================
Too many freaks, not enough circuses.

j.