Re: Need help with PD source (again)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Pete Lomax wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:43:41 -0400, h4x3r <h4x3r at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> 
> >> if find(SymTab[dup][S_FILE_NO], include_paths[current_file_no])
> >
> >changed to:
> >if find(SymTab[dup][S_FILE_NO], {include_paths[current_file_no]})
> >
> If you think about that carefully,  you may as well as not have
> replaced it with the equivalent:
> >if equal(SymTab[dup][S_FILE_NO],include_paths[current_file_no])
> but as Vincent notes it just breaks everything anyway.
> 
> Does Vincent's solution of replacing the previous
> 
> if length(dup_globals) > 1 then
> 
> with
> 
> if length(dup_globals) > 1 and
> sequence(include_paths[current_file_no]) then
> 
> fix it properly, or cause a different problem?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Pete
> 
> 

It seems to fix the problem, while still being fully functional.
Ive tested Matt's conflict demos that came with his modified eu v2.4
interpreter.. and the ones that came with Daryl Border's updated pd
source files... they all worked. plus i did alot of testing with
different programs and there doesnt seem to be any new problems.
(thank goodness, I've had enough problems as it is, and just fixed
them PPPlleease no more :P, heh..)

And "continue" is almost done, i will post back when Im finished,
maybe in a hour or so (after testing) :D.


Regards,
Vincent


Without walls and fences, there is no need for Windows and Gates.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu