Re: Proposal for a (small) enhancement to the value() function.
CChris wrote:
>
> Currently, value(), defined in get.e, takes a sequence and returns {status
> code,
> value read}.
> The proposed enhancement is to return
> {status code,
> value read,
> number of characters read,
> number of leading whitespace characters}.
>
> This can be done at the cost of creating a duplicated, slightly modified copy
> of the internal Get() function, so that performance won't be affacted at all.
> get() won't be affected, since where() will give you most of the same
> information.
>
> Any thoughts? issues? other suggestions?
> CChris
If backwards compatability is not affected, then no problems - since I'm
only interested in value[2] its not a problem for me.
Chris
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|