OpenEuphoria

Re: math operators

• Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Sep 21, 2003
• 446 views

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 19:52:29 -0700, kbochert at copper.net wrote:

>> If anyone is interested, I'll clean it up and post it. Maybe someone
>> with a fresh perspective can fix that for me.
>>=20
>
>I think this is an unjustly-ignored parsing technique. It is =
considerably faster than a=20
>recursive-descent parser, and much easier to follow and debug (for me at=
 least).
>The weirdness refered to above can be removed by checking for the =
alternation of=20
>operands and operators.

I'll take that as a firm offer then . I've posted it up on my web
page: http://palacebuilders.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/euphoria.html

Pete