Re: OpenEuphoria.org

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Robert Craig wrote:
<snip/>
> 
> My apologies to those who already started using
> the name OpenEuphoria, for their version of Euphoria 
> a few years ago. There doesn't seem to have been 
> any activity on that project for quite a while.
> 
> So, wherever you had bookmarked, or otherwise
> recorded "ListFilter.com", please change it to 
> OpenEuphoria.org, e.g. in your RSS readers.
> 
> I was very surprised at how quickly all this happened,
> so I wasn't able to warn everyone. I thought I'd have
> several days to change things over.
> 
> Regards,
>    Rob Craig
>    Rapid Deployment Software
>    <a href="http://www.RapidEuphoria.com">http://www.RapidEuphoria.com</a>

Apologies taken.
Since OpenEuphoria was a reaction against a perceived stiffness from RDS and
inability for users to get needed additions/changes into the language, it is not
inappropriate (for me) for you to recycle the name, since the openness is here
now, and since there has been hardly any activity indeed on that project for a
long while.

As the person who wrote the specs for OpenEuphoria (they are available at
http://oedoc.free.fr), I obviously hope that a sizable portion of these suggested
additions and changes will make their way into the language, and to contribute to
this end. Of course, changes which were accepted and wished by a minority of
dissenters won't all be allowed in by a larger user base. Detailed prior layout
of changes and careful listening to reactions/opinions/suggestions must be a
strict rule for open Euphoria, in my opinion.

CChris

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu