OpenEuphoria

Re: code reviews

• Posted by Dan B Moyer <DANMOYER at PRODIGY.NET> Aug 28, 2000
• 465 views

Irv,

I *think* the concern is with the *size* of the files, not the speed of
execution?

Dan

----- Original Message -----
From: "irv" <irv at ELLIJAY.COM>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: code reviews


> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> > Excellent. This is exactly what is required. I'm assuming you are
concerned
> > about the performance of win32lib. I'll update the file with these
> > improvements plus a few other similar ones. As for the overheads
(comments,
> > whitespace, long names,etc), I'm thinking we'll release two variants of
the
> > library - one fully commented and "beautified", and one stripped down
> > version.  Does anyone want to submit a utility to minimise a Euphoria
source
> > file?
>
> Derek:
>
> A quick test shows that adding several hundred lines of comments, and lots
of
> white space within a timed routine makes less than 1% difference in
execution
> time. I don't think it's worth the trouble to maintain an "uglyfied"
version.
>
> Regards,
> Irv