Re: 3.0.3?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Andy wrote:
> You serious? Why would he decided that? Was there nothing to do that would
> improve it?

You should realize that C.K. has quite a sense of humor.

We decided to call it 3.1, instead of 3.0.3,
when Juergen correctly pointed out that
it was actually a significant change from 3.0.2,
since, for instance, if you use Matt's new built-in routines,
find_from() or match_from(), your program will
require this new release to run - it won't run
with 3.0.2 or earlier.

Releases where only the third digit changes,
should probably only contain bug fixes 
and very minor enhancements.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu