Re: Some Euphoria questions
>er... sure... whatever... i agree to some point, but again, we're not
>companies... <at least not the ones we all have gone to know...> Sure i
>know
>that DLLs are getting old, everything eventually does! OCXs will probably
>get
>old in a year or so [maybe a couple]. And something else will come along
>and
>replace it. Euphoria does have some drawbacks and limitations, but
>everything
>does, and by fixing the problem everything will be great. But of course
>something else will come along and complicate it... Maybe so that RDS did
>keep the same basic engine from Whenever to now. And they are still fixing
>it. Thats fine. I myself have started looking to C/C++ cuz of the
>limitations
>of Euphoria, but i dont think that i'll stop useing it completely anytime
>soon... I'll probably only use the C i learn when i need it... And *simple*
>programing languages such as Euphoria...
Good.
Let everyone know that you won't put up with this bullshit untill they get
their act straight.
Go learn C/C++!
>~over and out~
>PS: I acually find 'mIRC remote' simpliar than Euphoria and i could find
>many
>ways to make Euphoria much more simple than it is now, and even give it
>some
>greater power maybe [just ideas... not acually making the lang]. But for
>what
>RDS has done, they sure did a good job...
Hmm...
Sometimes when you think you're making things simpler, they turn out to
complicate matters further.
Adding 4000 library routines to a language makes work a lot easier, but a
newby coder would be scared off immediatly.
Euphoria is pretty much as easy as it gets, for a C-Clone.
mIRC remote has it's moments, though.
Mike The Spike
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
