Re: Some Optimisations
>Mike, calm down, I wasn't attacking you and it's not fair to attack me
>back.
>I am perfectly aware of what a compiler is, thank you very much. I had
>misunderstood your original post as a comment to Euphoria, not 'C', since
>this isn't a 'C' channel (though with the new "translator" I suppose it may
>be going that way); so I appologise for any misunderstanding. That having
>been said, I agree that inlining a lot of the basic functions should almost
>be considered essential, even though some compilers are known to ignore the
>inline directive to suit their needs. I am suprised that that is not the
>case. C'est la vie.
Heh?
OK Then.
I'm sorry, I didn't know you missunderstood the topic.
And, you're right about two things.
One, some C compilers don't inline functions if they are called by address,
and two, I'm surprised it's not in there allready, it's an easy optmisation
wich gains a lot of speed on the math.
Mike The Spike
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
