OpenEuphoria

Re: Some Euphoria questions

• Posted by Mike Sabal <MikeS at NOTATIONS.COM> Aug 18, 2000
• 585 views

I've been staying out of the whole compiler war ever since it started for =
several reasons:

The bind utility with Euphoria quite adequately meets my need for =
stand-alone executables.  Any C++ compiler will usually (granted, not =
always) link larger than the equivalent Euphoria .exe, especially when you =
bundle the required .dll or .so files into a package.  I have a Windows =
package written in Euphoria that can still fit onto a single floppy disk.  =
An equivalent package written in C++ by another company, costing about =
US$30,000, requires significant hard disk space (~30Meg) and runs less =
reliably.

I don't need to squeeze every picosecond out of my PC.  I'm not doing =
intensive graphics updates, and the speed of my programs are usually =
limited by the speed of the hard disk anyway. =20

The ability to debug on the fly (when running an unbound program) instead =
of edit/compile/link/run/crash/debug makes my job a hundred times easier.

Now to M.T.S. et al:

Can you provide a sample output of your translator as Rob has done, so we =
can compare the output?

When is your website going to be active?  According to Network Solutions =
(InterNIC), that domain has yet to be registered.

Michael J. Sabal

>>> mikethespike2000 at HOTMAIL.COM 08/18/00 11:42AM >>>

Yes it is. Mail me personaly for a limited version if you want.

>    Will there be a public domain version available ?

... at my domain
www.U4iaInc.com, 'Inc' standing for Increment.