Re: Modifying the Euphoria interpreter
- Posted by CChris <christian.cuvier at agriculture.gouv.fr> Jun 12, 2007
- 594 views
Pete Lomax wrote: > > CChris wrote: > > > > Robert Craig wrote: > > > > > > If you try to *execute* an open_dll under DOS, > > > > PS: if indeed mentioning open_dll() will cause ex.exe to error out because > > it is not supported under DOS32, even though it will never execute the > > function, then I'll have to use the machine_func() equivalent, that's all > > it will take I bet. Thanks for pointing this potential problem out. > > I felt Rob was pretty clear on that. An "if platform()=WIN32" wrap around the > open_dll() call (and etc) should be fine. > > Regards, > Pete No, it's even worse than that. Remember that, if ex.exe tries to compile a program which mentions open_dll(), it errors out even though the the function won't ever be executed because the call is protected by a "if platform()=??? then". The error is generated before the platform dependent code is removed. But replacing the call with "machine_func(50,"kernel32.dll") won't hurt. CChris