Re: a.i
> >If you liken the human brain to the hardware, and our experience as the
> >software, and our instinct as the BIOS (?), then you'll begin to grasp
how
> >impossible it is to create a HUMAN AI at the moment.
>
> Negative.Simply put,look at Euphoria,ok?The interpreter understands
> a series of commands,a limited set of words generally refered to as
> a HIGH LEVEL PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE,the very word "interpreter" itself
> points to changing our words to something the computer understands.
You cannot liken the human intelligence to a programming language, not even
a high one.
> What Im thinking of is a VERY HIGH LEVEL language,with maybe thousands
> of words,(average person has what?60000 words in vocabulary?We start
> with the vocabulary of,say your average 3 year old).But not
> just a programming language,thats not the point,but use the technology
> of a computer lnguage's interpreter so that the program can understand
what
> we say.
The problem is, the human intelligence has 5 modes of input: vision, sound,
touch, taste, and smell. WITHOUT THESE, any "intelligent" creature will not
be able to "understand what we say." It's that simple. Intelligence is
experiential... it has to be because it is so complex.
> You also use this very high level language to program all
> your instincts,or you could just use euphoria.Do you see what I mean?
> And what do you think of the idea,would it work?
It's an approach I'd not heard before... but you'd have to give it sensory
input and then use EUPHORIA to develop the instinct programming to utilize
that input.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
