Re: Compiler Source Code
On Thursday 21 November 2002 09:50 pm, Rom wrote:
> The real value of simplicity is that then everyone can contribute, and just
> eyeballing code becomes good verification. Unluckily that does not seem to
> be the case for Eu/Peu core?
True - although Peu could be made understandable if it were thoroughly
commented. However, there are some really basic design flaws in Eu/Peu that
should be addressed first.
> Euphoria need an up to date IDE/debugger for sure.
It does, but it isn't likely to happen.
A GUI debugger shouldn't be too hard to write, the one which comes with wxLua
is 1764 lines of code, and it implements a syntax-highlighting editor,
breakpoints, watches, etc. nicely.
The reason Euphoria won't have one is because Rob doesn't see the need for
such "new-fangled" things, and no one else is able to hook to the necessary
Euphoria internals.
Sorry.
Irv
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
