Re: Eu Rebellion (was: New Euphoria Users Website)
- Posted by Kat <kat at kogeijin.com> Nov 15, 2002
- 486 views
On 15 Nov 2002, at 18:05, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote: > > On 0, "C. K. Lester" <cklester at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Despite all the GUI toolkits, Euphoria is still a DOS application. > > Anything > > > extention beyond that has been developed by the users, and isn't > > officially > > > supported by RDS. > > > > As such, why concern ourselves what will be "supported" by RDS? Let's start > > a > > EUPHORIA Users Group that will build on the core provided by RDS. Who cares > > what RobC will "support" or not? We're just using him for his core language. > > :) > > > > There are groups who do the same with Java, VB, Python, Puka, Lua, > > LiverNuts, etc... > > > > > I'm not saying this is a bad thing. That's just the way it is, and I don't > > see > > > any reason to think it will change in the near future. > > > > RDS won't change it, but what stops a group of brilliant developers from > > taking things as far as possible? > > > > Or is the core of EUPHORIA just too limiting? Or are there different > > roadblocks? > > > > This was the idea behind Dredge. Exu was the core, and then the parsers > would > build on top of it. However, this didn't inspire a lot of people, > apparently, > so I've decided it may be time to put it on the back burner. > > Instead, I'm gonna try to move to an open-source Exu. Perhaps this might > inspire more people? Except for the "u" in exu. Kat