OpenEuphoria

Re: The A.I. Project

• Posted by Kat <kat at kogeijin.com> Nov 09, 2002
• 512 views

On 9 Nov 2002, at 7:05, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:

> 
> On  0, Rom <kjehas at frisurf.no> wrote:

<snip>

> > Conclusion.
> > Trying to simulate worms or things like that will fail because Euphoria 
> > hasn't been adapted to logical programming. Those who think this is just a
> > matter of ordinary programming cannot even create a decent demo expert
> > system
> > with Euphoria ... I am afraid.
> 
> Ok, you're right. This is not a matter of ordinary programming. But keep
> in mind that languages such a Prolog and LISP are written in another
> language (C i believe, I remember seeing one implementation of LISP in
> Java ...) and that with the proper programming it is most certainly
> possible in EU.

But the Eu interpreter is also written in C, like the early interpreters for the
"recognised" Ai languages. Adding a few features to Eu will result in the 
same abilities. Wasn't Google written in Lisp?

Kat