Re: The A.I. Project
- Posted by Kat <kat at kogeijin.com> Nov 09, 2002
- 512 views
On 9 Nov 2002, at 7:05, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote: > > On 0, Rom <kjehas at frisurf.no> wrote: <snip> > > Conclusion. > > Trying to simulate worms or things like that will fail because Euphoria > > hasn't been adapted to logical programming. Those who think this is just a > > matter of ordinary programming cannot even create a decent demo expert > > system > > with Euphoria ... I am afraid. > > Ok, you're right. This is not a matter of ordinary programming. But keep > in mind that languages such a Prolog and LISP are written in another > language (C i believe, I remember seeing one implementation of LISP in > Java ...) and that with the proper programming it is most certainly > possible in EU. But the Eu interpreter is also written in C, like the early interpreters for the "recognised" Ai languages. Adding a few features to Eu will result in the same abilities. Wasn't Google written in Lisp? Kat