RE: The A.I. Project II
- Posted by mistertrik at hotmail.com Nov 07, 2002
- 414 views
Yes, I did that also. I chose to remove all the code for if it lost a game, because it never did. Every game it'd either win or draw. Kinda boring to play against though. ===================================================== .______<-------------------\__ / _____<--------------------__|=== ||_ <-------------------/ \__| Mr Trick >From: Kat <kat at kogeijin.com> >Subject: RE: The A.I. Project II > > >On 6 Nov 2002, at 21:33, C. K. Lester wrote: > > > > > > Maybe we should start with the very basics first. > > > > > > Maybe get some 'brain base' to be able to play tic-tac-toe... > > > > Then you're simply making an expert system that can play tic-tac-toe. > > > > And playing tic-tac-toe is no easy feat. You say that's the basics, but > > you've gone waaaaay beyond the basics to suggest that our AI entity can >play a > > game and learn from it! > >Tic-tac-toe is a very restricted domain, and a very restricted solution >set. You >can make a "computer" that plays that game with relays. I worked out the >logic for it in the 7th grade. It didn't learn. > >Kat > > >