OpenEuphoria

Re: AI Project

• Posted by jbrown105 at speedymail.org Nov 06, 2002
• 669 views

On  0, Kat <kat at kogeijin.com> wrote:
> 
> On 7 Nov 2002, at 10:22, dm31 at uow.edu.au wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Well, first thing first. We should really get a GOOD N-Net Lib going
> > first.
> > 
> > Now, this is a thought about programming AI that I have had for
> > awhile. Everyone that tries programming AI uses a 'static' N-Net, by
> > that I mean, all the wiring is pre-programming and doesn't change,
> > connections change, but can not be made.
> 
> Until the shared memory libs was written, you couldn't change any Eu 
> program either. You couldn't execute sequences as if they were Eu code, 
> except in David Cuny's interpreter. We still can't launch threads, but
> parallel
> processing without real threads may very well be an enormous blessing in 
> disguise. The other problem is longevity, winOSs haveto get rebooted 
> occasionally, and getting the program to remember what it knows and how it 
> knows, and what to do with what it knows, and the last state of the "brain", 
> will be a pain, because (for example) we cannot look up the list of vars 
> (names and contents) like Mirc or Lua can do.
> 
> Kat
> 

Wow. You sound almost like a Dredge fan.

Seriously, the "simulated" neural net is mostly data structures.
The hard-coded stuff will be the initial state of the data strucutres
and the Eu code itself which actually maniplulates the data structures.

I once borrowed a neural net lib and genetic algorithm lib from the
archives
to do something like this, but I failed. (And i dont have that code
anymore
either, in case youre wondering.)

jbrown

Linux User:190064
Linux Machine:84163


--