Re: poke2 (to Rob)
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Sep 15, 2001
- 433 views
On 15 Sep 2001, at 19:18, Robert Craig wrote: > > Rolf writes: > > do you see the neccessity to have a poke2() > > implemented into Euphoria? > > What is your opinion or your recommendation instead? > > I haven't seen a big demand for poke2(). > If I added it, I'd also have to add peek2u() and peek2s() > for completeness. In most cases where it comes up, > speed is not critical, so (assuming a "little-endian" Intel machine) > you could use: > > poke(address, {number, floor(number/256)}) > > On my 350 Mhz Pentium, I can do the above statement > over 1.4 million times per second. Ouch!! 233 clocks to execute one poke? Kat