Re: New  rtrim()
	
	
	
	
Colin,
> 
> Igor Kachan wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Yes, Colin, this function is not the noticeable
> > one for the putsxy.e perfomance.
> > 
> > But try please the test below.
> > 
> 
> Igor,
> 
> Your test program always returns an empty sequence
> instead of a slice,
I have tested
S=repeat({1,1}&repeat(0,1000),1000)
just now.
Result is
10.27 with rtrim_()
14.34 with rtrim()
> because your test sequences contain only zeros.
> This isn't a realistic 
> test, and it gives you an artificially fast score 
> for your version of 
> rtrim().
I think, this test is just the hardest
for such the program.
<snip>
Don't worry, use, thing is good enough
and very well tested now  
Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru
	
	
		| 
			 
									Not Categorized, Please Help
						 
		 | 
		
					 |