Re: so far so good
- Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Mar 29, 2005
- 474 views
richard koch wrote: > > livly isn't it. > > a guy (darek parnell) seems to want to rewrite - or to facilitate > euphoria in d - why? May I repeat what I have written earlier ... " . . . because the development path that RDS has for their Euphoria implentation is not compatible with my needs. . . . I can concentrate on creating products that would be alternatives to some of the RDS products. These would still be focused, or derived, from the Euphoria language. " I am not saying that RDS or Robert Craig is right or wrong, or that the company's policy is wrong or right. I have nothing to say on that issue at all. What I am saying is "the development path that RDS has for their Euphoria implentation is not compatible with *my* needs". Euphoria is a wonderful language and there exists a number of problem domains in which it can excell. I actively promote Euphoria in other forums when it is appropriate to do so. I am careful to avoid using language that might be harmful to RDS or Robert in any public forum, as that is not helpful to anybody. But I do document my history when appropriate, and thus I'm sure some people may try to infer things that may not be factual. My reasons for moving away from the RDS sponsored implementation of Euphoria are selfish. *My* needs for the development of the language are not going to be met by RDS in the near (or foreseeable) future. That is the perogative of RDS and I don't dispute that. It is a matter of history that provides evidence that the development methodology of RDS and my needs are not compatible. If I develop products that somehow compete, or provide alternatives, to RDS products, then that effect will be incidental. The purpose of developing products based on Euphoria is meet *my* needs for the language. It is not the purpose to compete with RDS. In fact, I don't care if nobody wants to use whatever tools I may develop. I want to achieve things that I can't with the RDS implementation of Euphoria. After spending many years in discussion, without having any timely effect on the development of RDS Euphoria, I am now addressing the situation in a different manner. Namely, attempting to make the language even more useful to myself. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia