RE: Aesthetically pleasing identifier names
- Posted by "Ricardo M. Forno" <rforno at uyuyuy.com> Mar 08, 2005
- 495 views
Agreed. I do so. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Brent W. Hughes <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> To: <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 5:01 PM Subject: Aesthetically pleasing identifier names > > > posted by: Brent W. Hughes <bwh566 at yahoo.com> > > When I was a young and tender programmer, if I wanted to declare a function to, say, set a menu bar to a certain value, I would probably name the function something like "smb" which of course, stood for "set menu bar". > > After a few years, I decided that that was not very self-documenting, so I would name such a variable "setmenubar". This made the code more readable and was worth the extra typing. > > Sometime later, I saw people using underscores in their identifier names, and I decided to give that a try. My function would hence be called "set_menu_bar". > > Still years later, I began to see people using case to separate the individual words in an identifier name. I tried it. My function would now be called "SetMenuBar". I found my code to be more readable and much more aesthetically pleasing. In fact, I have become a convert to this way of naming identifiers. As a convert, I am now trying to get others to see the light so that it will be easier to read their code. > > What do you think? > > Brent > > > >