Re: [OT] Re: Octal and Binary Literals

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Pete Lomax wrote:
> 
> Eu currently parses it as "0" and "xx()". Supporting "0xNN" format numbers
> means
> it will cause a "missing digits" compile-time error. Hardly worth mentioning
> and highly unlikely to occur within any existing code.

Yeah, I had assumed that whitespace was required, but it kinda makes sense.
Of course, I replied before actually testing it out.  But I suppose that
raises a question of, is this a bug?

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu