OpenEuphoria

Re: direction2

• Posted by bfurniss <bfurniss at IHUG.CO.NZ> Mar 20, 2000
• 456 views

At 10:14 PM 3/18/00 -0800, you wrote:
>bfurniss wrote:
>
>>>Urm... exactly why is this interesting?
>> I thought that you spent a little while constructing a
>> parser because YOU had an interest in this!
>
>I'm not trying to discourage your work, but the 'mathematical expression'
>parser was written some time back because someone requested a parser for
>their program. I am interested in parsers (I've written zillions of them),
>but I'm having trouble making a leap of logic here. You've provided me with
>a library for working with extended numbers and a very abstract flowchart
>that is, well, a bit short on details.
>
>In any event, don't let my thick-headedness stop you from your project!
>
>-- David Cuny
>
    Dear David,

    The two topics , the Parser and the LOGIC , are presently unrelated.

    Yes the schematic for the Parser does , intentionally , lack detail ;
   I'm trying to get your grey cells working a bit. I can assure you though,
   through many late nights of investigation, that this appears to be a very
   valid approach.

    As for the LOGIC , this is an attempt at introducing some structure
   to my programming ; if you have an assembly language handbook and a basic
   understanding of LOGIC then you might appreciate what I'm at least
   attempting.
    This LOGICAL approach was also adopted after I saw software being
   written in C/C++ for Euphoria , or converted from C/C++ to Euphoria type
   code that was undecipherable in terms of C/C++, Euphoria or Assembly
   Language . As you well know 32-bit assembly language is available through
   Euphoria ; and can be useful for some high speed applications.
                                    -----