Re: direction2
- Posted by bfurniss <bfurniss at IHUG.CO.NZ> Mar 20, 2000
- 456 views
At 10:14 PM 3/18/00 -0800, you wrote: >bfurniss wrote: > >>>Urm... exactly why is this interesting? >> I thought that you spent a little while constructing a >> parser because YOU had an interest in this! > >I'm not trying to discourage your work, but the 'mathematical expression' >parser was written some time back because someone requested a parser for >their program. I am interested in parsers (I've written zillions of them), >but I'm having trouble making a leap of logic here. You've provided me with >a library for working with extended numbers and a very abstract flowchart >that is, well, a bit short on details. > >In any event, don't let my thick-headedness stop you from your project! > >-- David Cuny > Dear David, The two topics , the Parser and the LOGIC , are presently unrelated. Yes the schematic for the Parser does , intentionally , lack detail ; I'm trying to get your grey cells working a bit. I can assure you though, through many late nights of investigation, that this appears to be a very valid approach. As for the LOGIC , this is an attempt at introducing some structure to my programming ; if you have an assembly language handbook and a basic understanding of LOGIC then you might appreciate what I'm at least attempting. This LOGICAL approach was also adopted after I saw software being written in C/C++ for Euphoria , or converted from C/C++ to Euphoria type code that was undecipherable in terms of C/C++, Euphoria or Assembly Language . As you well know 32-bit assembly language is available through Euphoria ; and can be useful for some high speed applications. -----