Re: Protection of our software
Rolf wrote:
> Igor Kachan wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Why not good, why not antiwarez?
>> Any webmaster has the right for his own mistakes.
>
> Could you BOTH please explain to me what you mean/understand with/by
> the term 'warez' and 'antiwarez'?
With "warez" I mean this:
http://foldoc.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?query=warez&action=Search
The first time I read the term "antiwarez" was in Igor's post.
I belive it denotes something against warez.
>> There are just mistakes & mistakes.
>
> That's the only thing that's clear to me in the moment... .
>
>> Let us try to correct the situation.
>
> Indeed!
The bottom line is:
Someone had violated my software license.
This is illegal, and I don't like it.
I had asked the Eu community for some help, what I can do, in order to
prevent something like that in the future.
Regards,
Juergen
--
/"\ ASCII ribbon campain | This message has been ROT-13 encrypted
\ / against HTML in | twice for higher security.
X e-mail and news, |
/ \ and unneeded MIME | http://home.arcor.de/luethje/prog/
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|