Re: Protection of our software

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Rolf wrote:

> Igor Kachan wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Why not good, why not antiwarez?
>> Any webmaster has the right for his own mistakes.
>
> Could you BOTH please explain to me what you mean/understand with/by
> the term 'warez' and 'antiwarez'?

With "warez" I mean this:
http://foldoc.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?query=warez&action=Search

The first time I read the term "antiwarez" was in Igor's post.
I belive it denotes something against warez.

>> There are just mistakes & mistakes.
>
> That's the only thing that's clear to me in the moment... .
>
>> Let us try to correct the situation.
>
> Indeed!

The bottom line is:
Someone had violated my software license.
This is illegal, and I don't like it.
I had asked the Eu community for some help, what I can do, in order to
prevent something like that in the future.

Regards,
   Juergen

-- 
 /"\  ASCII ribbon campain  |  This message has been ROT-13 encrypted
 \ /  against HTML in       |  twice for higher security.
  X   e-mail and news,      |
 / \  and unneeded MIME     |  http://home.arcor.de/luethje/prog/

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu