Re: Protection of our software

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hi Juergen,

----------
> From: Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de>
> Subject: Re: Protection of our software
> 
> 
> Hi Igor,
> 
> thanks for your reply. You wrote:
> 
> > Hi Juergen,
> >
> > ----------
> >> From: Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de>
> >> To: EUforum <EUforum at topica.com>
> >> Subject: Protection of our software
> >> Sent: 15 nov 2003 y. 14:52
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >
> > [snipped]
> >
> >> Yesterday I discovered, that a guy in Russia had split
> >> the file into two pieces, and distributes the pieces separately!
> >> "... as long as ... the file 'mbox100.zip' is distributed
> >> unchanged and completely." should be clear enough to state,
> >> that this isn't allowed, no?
> >
> > [snipped]
> >
> >> I mailed to the guy who I mentioned above:
> >> "... you are violating the license ... it is not allowed
> >>  to distribute the file in two separate pieces, like you do.
> >> Please stop that!"
> >>
> >> He answered:
> >> "I didn't think it is so important. The rule of my server
> >> is to distribute program and it sources if included
> >> separately."
> >
> > I can not find  'mbox100.zip' in Russian Internet
> > just now -- rambler, yandex, google have no info about
> > this file here.
> >
> > Maybe that guy has deleted your splited file from
> > his server now ...
> >
> > Or it is just not registered for now on search engines.
> >
> > Or just names are different ... Yes, names are different!
> 
> Yes, instead of the original file 'mbox100.zip', he distributes the
> two files 'wcx_mbox_1.0.rar' and 'wcx_mbox_1.0_source.rar'. sad(
> 
> > Please, let me know the address privately, if you have no protests.
> 
> I'll be happy to do so, thanks. I just didn't like to mention the URL
> in public, because that would be kind of advertisement for his website.

I was on that site just now, on the separate page about your program too.
This is a good Russian antiwarez site, your personal page on this site
has the link with your own site, I can download only one package
with the licence and the source. 
Yes, the package is renamed, but it is due to repacking with the Rar
archiver only, I think.

There is the pointing to author : Juergen Luethje.

All right, I think. 

Site is:

http://www.wincmd.ru/

Your personal page is:

http://www.wincmd.ru/show.php?id=mbox

Don't worry be just happy!

> > I think, that guy just doesn't understand your license well enough.
> 
> Yes, may be. That's why I posted the license here. It would be very nice,
> if one or two native English speakers tell me, if it contains e.g. any
> ambiguous statement.
> When then someone in the world reads the license, it's not under my
> influence, whether or not s/he understands English ...
> 
> > Free ... What else ...
> >
> > I know, I am wrong here, there is free and free, software too.
> >
> > And the "free" word has more than 50 translations into Russian.
> >
> > But my own 'free' is free of any restrictions at all,
> > for example, in the polyglot.zip package.
> 
> I see, but my license does not only consist of the word "free". smile
> 
> Well, I hope this guy will now change the stuff on his website.
> My main question is, how to prevent things like this in the future.
> 
> Best regards,
>    Juergen


Best regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu