OpenEuphoria

Re: c_proc/func() bug ?

• Posted by "Daniel Kluss" <codepilot at netzero.net> Nov 11, 2003
• 605 views

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "mic _" <stabmaster_ at hotmail.com>
To: <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: c_proc/func() bug ?


>
>
> I was playing around with the new ability to use define_c_proc/func and
> c_proc/func with machine code functions. What puzzled me a bit was the
order
> in which arguments are pushed.
>
> Assume the following:
>
> foo = define_c_func("", function_pointer, {C_INT,C_INT,C_INT}, C_INT)
> result = c_func(foo, {1, 2, 3})
>
> Since this uses stdcall, the stack should look like this when the function
> is called:
>
> esp+0:   return address
> esp+4:   3
> esp+8:   2
> esp+12: 1
>
> But what i got was this:
>
> esp+0:   return address
> esp+4:   1
> esp+8:   2
> esp+12: 3
>
> What gives?
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>