OpenEuphoria

Re: The Great Computer Language Shootout

• Posted by kbochert at copper.net Nov 08, 2003
• 571 views

On 8 Nov 2003 at 20:41, Derek Parnell wrote:

> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <kbochert at copper.net>
> To: <EUforum at topica.com>
> Subject: Re: The Great Computer Language Shootout
> 
> 
> > On 8 Nov 2003 at 17:46, jiri babor wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Clean: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~clean/index.html
> > > 
> > Thanks.
> > > 14 benchmarks should give you a fair comparison. How did it look?
> > > 
> > > jiri
> > > 
> > Mostly very good. The complete list of results is at:
> > http://catexa.com/bachman/html/benchmarks.html
> > 
> 
> I assume that the percentages in this comparision mean that Bach is faster
> than Eu2.3. The format of the table is a bit ambiguous - at first I thought you
> were saying that Bach took 102% of the time that Eu2.3 took, for example.
> 
> -- 
> Derek

I'll try and clear that up. As you guessed, 102% is good for Bach.
The actual result will vary somewhat depending on the exact details of
the test, so the 2% is within the margin of error, but it was a moral victory
for me.  I had to work VERY hard to maintain Eu's speed.

regards
KtB