Re: The Great Computer Language Shootout
- Posted by kbochert at copper.net Nov 08, 2003
- 601 views
On 8 Nov 2003 at 20:41, Derek Parnell wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <kbochert at copper.net> > To: <EUforum at topica.com> > Subject: Re: The Great Computer Language Shootout > > > > On 8 Nov 2003 at 17:46, jiri babor wrote: > > > > > > > > Clean: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~clean/index.html > > > > > Thanks. > > > 14 benchmarks should give you a fair comparison. How did it look? > > > > > > jiri > > > > > Mostly very good. The complete list of results is at: > > http://catexa.com/bachman/html/benchmarks.html > > > > I assume that the percentages in this comparision mean that Bach is faster > than Eu2.3. The format of the table is a bit ambiguous - at first I thought you > were saying that Bach took 102% of the time that Eu2.3 took, for example. > > -- > Derek I'll try and clear that up. As you guessed, 102% is good for Bach. The actual result will vary somewhat depending on the exact details of the test, so the 2% is within the margin of error, but it was a moral victory for me. I had to work VERY hard to maintain Eu's speed. regards KtB