Re: Yay for me, found an interpreter bug!

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Al Getz" <Xaxo at aol.com>
To: <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: RE: Yay for me, found an interpreter bug!


> 
> Hi Pete,
> 
> Really, saying it's doing what it 'should' be doing is like
> saying 'routine_id' is doing what it should be doing too.
> We already know it might be documented etc.
> 
> Yes, you can say it's doing what it 'should' be doing, but
> you cant say it's doing what it 'could' be doing.
> It 'could' be including as a new file under a new file prefix,
> AND what it's doing now smile
> 

However, you can get it to work as you'd like to , namely including the file
twice. All you have to do is place a copy of the include file in two different
folders and include it thus ...

  include one\namespacebugtest.e as TEST1
  include two\namespacebugtest.e as TEST2

and this will work just fine then. That is, you will have two instances of the
local variables defined in the include file.

A kludge, but it works.

-- 
Derek

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu