OpenEuphoria

RE:

• Posted by sergio <sergelli at uol.com.br> Nov 10, 2001
• 688 views

Igor Kachan wrote:
> Imagine file.exe which you get with DJGPP,
> and DJGPP's **some** functions which are 
> slower than same **some** functions of WATCOM,
> then file.exe you get with WATCOM will be
> faster, and ever ex.exe file.ex may be
> faster than that DJGPP's file.exe above.
> 
> All these things about slower/faster 
> require the very careful testing on 
> monotask OS, for example in plain Dos-32
> mode.
> 
> Binded .exe, not compiled, may be 'more'
> fast than just ex.exe file.ex.
> 
> Also these things are depending from the 
> amount of free memory on your machine in 
> the concrete session, and are random in 
> the most cases.
> 
> Try carefully another programs, not EU's,
> and you'll get same random results.
> 
 
I don't understand, if is fastest when uses EX.EXE
why someone uses an EXE file?

thanks



sergio