OpenEuphoria

Re: Why some people have not upgraded

• Posted by Matt Lewis <matthewwalkerlewis at gmail.com> Dec 30, 2005
• 505 views

Vincent wrote:
> 
> Juergen Luethje wrote:
> 
> > A library isn't necessary at all to do this. This has been discussed
> > here hundred times before. Why now discuss it again?
> 
> There is really only one way to do it now, so your method must be very simular
> to mine. Using a library with routines is more elegent that using open() and
> puts(fn, ...); my library is much like a include system with a duplicate file
> name scanner, and supports nesting dynamic/conditional includes. But you're
> right, there is no reason to discuss this again.
>  

But wrapping these things just so inefficient.  You might as well start
including machine.e and stop calling machine_proc.

Matt Lewis