Re: Exercism maintainers

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Sorry, what I meant is simply that std/unittest.e defines 

public procedure test_equal(sequence name, object expected, object outcome)

so the 2nd & 3rd parameters are the wrong way round for all the tests you've written. Ick.
I'd be tempted to write a test_aquel() shim that just flips them, and copy that into 20 18 files.

UPDATE: Ah, I now see glennj reported the exact same thing yesterday. PR created, merged, and issue closed.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu