Re: wikipedia draft

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
  • Posted by ghaberek (admin) Jan 01, 2021
  • 2091 views
irv said...

I personally wouldn't waste much time with Wikipedia. I fail to see any benefit to being listed there.

Wikipedia is meant to be a place for storing knowledge. As it sits, I'd agree with the editor who declined the article that the content is too advertiser-y and not knowledge-y enough.

Also the Phix article reads like a direct copy/paste of the article for Euphoria. It'd probably be better for the article to have its own voice.

Which, by the way, Euphoria isn't even linked to correctly and instead implies that Phix is influenced solely by the concept of "euphoria" itself. Might wanna fix that, Pete. blink

-Greg

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu