Re: Pocket PC, Sucess anyone?
- Posted by Jeremy Peterson <ptl99 at hotmail.com> Dec 14, 2005
- 803 views
Vincent wrote: > > Jeremy Peterson wrote: > > > Well I don't like to brag but...> > I'm a fairly good C programmer but there are a lot of Elite C programmers > > out > > in the open source world. Why don't you go to one of those Gnu forums and > > put > > the word out that you're looking for someone for this job. > > Heh, I doubt anyone other than a Euphorian would be interested in the C source > code offer. I really dont want to make a big deal out of this if nobody is > interested. > I'm not at a total loss though, since I'm learning ISE Eiffel, which has so > much that I'm not going to mention here. Eiffel? I looked at it, but the syntax is like Lisp to me. > > Actually, I was thinking of re-implementing Eu completely in D. It is as > > fast > > as C, much easier to program in, and would be easier to use to implement > > stuff > > like OOP, threads, and wrapping dlls. The downside of this is that I'd have > > to start from scratch, but it would solve any licensing problems with Rob's > > source code. On the other hand, looking at the OpenEu, Peu, Bach, Posetf > > projects, > > I get the feeling that not many people would use this if implemented. It > > would > > be slower with added features, and some people think this is a serious > > problem, > > though with today's computers it is less so. > > Too, I wouldn't want to take away Rob's bread and butter. I'm rather > > confused > > by him. He seems to want Eu to remain simple, like a beginner's language or > > something. Why doesn't he implement an Expert version of Eu with these > > features??? > > RDS is a very confusing company. > > Derek Parnell is making an Euphoria clone in D, he plans on using it for his > personal needs, but if he releases it to the general public, it will likely > fail just like all the other imitations. He and Georg Wrede hang around in the > Digital Mars D programming forum. He is??? How come I haven't heard anything about this before? > There is no way D could be as fast as highly optimized C. D is loaded with > features, > including garbage collection (which slows things down a little). > I suppose D looks superior to C and C++, but looks more like feces against > Euphoria > in most cases. There is too a way. D can use inline asm just like C, and the other features let you program better so your program runs faster. > > You could always hire RDS to do this, they have that page on the web site > > that > > says they will take programming jobs at cheap rates.
No... I don't > > think > > Rob would go for that. > > I couldn't afford to hire RDS. For example, they wanted $300 USD to add INSERT > functionality into my specific copy of the Public Domain source code! Judging > by what Rob said about the price of adding a "goto" label construct to the > language, > I'm guessing it could cost me upwards of a million dollars for what I want. > LOL :P > > > Later, > > Jeremy Peterson > > Cheers, > Vincent Why don't you pay Derek to put this stuff in for you? I doubt he'd charge as much as RDS.
Later, Jeremy Peterson