OpenEuphoria

Re: Rob: No reply?

• Posted by D. Newhall <derek_newhall at yahoo.com> Dec 09, 2005
• 572 views

Vincent wrote:
> 
> Robert Craig wrote:
> 
> > Most new people will be more interested in the Binder than 
> > in the Translator or Source.
> 
> Notice how you said "most"? That was definitely not the case with me. I must
> of spent several months playing with the translator before ever learning the
> language in any significant detail! In the beginning, I had little or no
> interest
> in Euphoria, I just wanted to translate stuff. It's safe to say that I've done
> my fair share of regression testing for it. :P
> 
> The translator really facisinated me because:
> 
> a) It can speed up my programs upto 5 times. :D
> b) I can tweak compiler options for slightly better performance. :D
> c) I can make DLLs or SOs. :)
> 
> I hope the translator works with the new Borland C++Builder 2006 compiler. If
> it doesn't, perhaps you could add support for it in your Borland static
> library
> used by the translator?
(snip)

I completely agree here. I asked for the translator for Christmas last year and
would much rather be able to speed my programs up and make DLLs than just make
bound exes.


The Euphoria Standard Library project :
    http://esl.sourceforge.net/
The Euphoria Standard Library mailing list :
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/esl-discussion