Re: binary search with reference to append
- Posted by gimlet Jun 22, 2014
- 1658 views
gimlet said...
I wasn't addressing that to you, more to Jaygade. However you have not demonstrated that you understand.
This is just a veiled way of stating that I do not understand.
I contend that I have demonstrated that I understand.
In fact, I could go further, and claim that, by your missteps (not understanding binary search and sorting arrays, advocating and then contradicting design by contract) that you understand less.
I never said you did not understand binary search.
I did say the array does not have to be sorted.
Your 'counter-example' is no counter example.
You did not check my sources.
But this is all besides the point. You are saying that binary_search() is fine, except we should drop the slicing functionality and the jaygade point, as you think that seem to overcomplicate things.
Jim,
If you are going to ban everyone who disagrees Euphoria will die.
You want to ban me because I doubted your qualifications. Perhaps I was wrong, perhaps I was not. Banning me doesn't prove anything other than that you can ban people (for whatever reason you provide).
