Re: Prototype-Based Programming

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message
jimcbrown said...

Actually, though it's possible I'm misunderstanding or something, this appears to make sense to me.

Basically, using the example of custom matrices, OP points out that OP can make new types without having to resort to OOP to do it. In other words, OOP is not necessary even if you want to be able to define new types - so that's one OOP-only use case that can be crossed off the list. Or something like that, anyways.

Yeah...except that's not what he said, even if it's what he meant. His statement about OOP was just a non sequitur. At best, a statement of personal preference.

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu