OpenEuphoria

Re: New month, new suggestion(?)

• Posted by Mike Hurley <mike_hurley_2 at YAHOO.COM> May 03, 2000
• 675 views

> This would help registered Euphorians, who like to
> distribute the
> occasional compiled package, but don't want to
> include the "weight" of the
> interpreter.

If you bound your program to pdex.exe, wouldn't it be
just as big as binding it to ex.exe?  I don't see the
advantage as to requireing the code be shrouded and
scrambled, as most people pick those options anyway
(don't they?)  Perhaps I'm just confused, please try
to explain.  Also, another thing about Linux...people
don't need bindu to make executables in Euphoria.  The
just need to make their own shrouding routine up and
put the #!/eudir/bin/exu line at the top of their
program.

Somewhat confused,
Mike Hurley

=====
Think about it-

Bill Gates has enough money to buy everybody in the world a large
pizza.  Most of us don't even have enough money to buy everybody
in the world a 20 minute phone call for 99 cents!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/